Sunday, October 18, 2009

OBAMA AND FOX NEWS


OBAMA TEAM AND FOX NEWS WAR

Why are Obama and his minions going after Fox News? I really am shocked at the consistent and terribly timed media relations strategies of the administration. What do they have to gain in this type of dialogue. FOX NEWS ratings are up 20% since Obama took office. This is a business. Bashing OBAMA sells adtime -- It is as simple as that. Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly are a powerful trio and destroy everyone else in the ratings.

Maybe the White House should take a look a their policy proposals and actions and question why millions of eyeballs tune in to see their administration skewered night after night. This is a no-win battle for Obama and he should back down and focus on the weighty matters that are effecting our country.


Tuesday, October 14, 2008

JOE BIDEN PROMISES MASSIVE EXPANSION OF THE LABOR MOVEMENT AND UNIONISM

Why Is John McCain Ignoring The Employee Free Choice Act

LINK TO EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT ADVERTISEMENT

It is shocking and amazing that John McCain continues to take hit after hit in the debates without responding to Obama's outragerous claims and policies. The pledge of tax decreases to 95% of the American population is an outright fabrication, and has been discredited widely including in a recent Wall Street Journal Article. Obama's mantra that the middle-class drives the American economy really is pathetic. Again and again for some unknown reason McCain lets these claims go without retort in the debates.

Regardless of these issues it is shocking that McCain has barely even whispered about Obama's support for the Employee Free Choice Act. The Unions have pumped about a billion dollars into the effort to get this law passed. Most people don't know that the act was already ratified by the House and is currently blockaded by the Senate and a promised veto from President Bush. If Obama wins this law is coming and American industry and clout will become a thing of the past.

Why does McCain fail to bring this up?

The Employee Free Choice Act will:

Eliminate the secret ballot in union election
Mandate binding arbitration during contract negotiations
Dramatically increase the fines for unfair labor practices for employers

Read more about this and get the word out...This is the #1 issue for the labor movement and a massive move towards the Europeanization of America -- Which is Obama's dream!!

HOW THE EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT TAKES AWAY WORKERS RIGHTS

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

WHY IS NBC HIDING THIS SKIT -- THE DIRTY TRUTH ABOUT THE SUBPRIME MORTGAGE MESS

THIS IS THE LINK TO THE BANNED SNL SKIT THAT NBC DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE!!

CLICK HERE TO ENJOY --

TO GET SOME CONTEXT ON THE CONTROVERSIAL AND UNPRECEDENTED CENSORSHIP READ THESE ARTICLES BELOW -- THE BOTTOM-LINE IS THAT THAT SKIT IS DEAD ON AND HITS THE DEMS RIGHT WHERE IT HURTS -- MAKING FUN OF THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE SUB-PRIME LENDING CRISIS.

THE PARODY OF BARNEY FRANK IS PRICELESS!!

CONTEXT OF THE DECISION TO YANK THE SKETCH...

BANNED SNL SKIT -- GET THIS LINK OUT TO THE MASSES

http://patdollard.com/2008/10/it-is-here-the-banned-snl-skit-cannot-hide-from-louie/


This is the link to the skit that NBC does not want you to see -- have fun!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Why Did Sen. Obama Keep Calling Him "John"?

Most pundits agree that there was no major gaffe or soundbite that sticks out for either candidate from last night's debate. However, I have to admit every time I heard Senator Obama refer to Senator McCain as "John" it sent a chill up my spine and made me cringe. I went back to the debate transcript and counted "23" times that Obama call him "John".

Doesn't Senator McCain deserve a little bit of respect and deference? This was not a political discussion at the company picnic or at the annual block party. This was a Presidential Debate!

This informal rhetoric is unprecedented. Senator Kerry did not use "George" once in any of the debates in 2004. Then Governor Bush, never referred to Vice-President Gore as "AL". No "Bill's" out of the mouth of George HW Bush or "George's" from the Governor Clinton.

And no "Ron's" from President Carter of Senator Mondale...

Who does BARACK think he is? Is he trying to make-up for his weak resume -- by pretending that he is on the same level as Senator McCain?

I think this informality was a problem for Obama -- It was not Presidential.

Friday, August 8, 2008

It's Gotta Be Mitt or Huck -- Can't we broker a truce between the two camps?

With 90 days to go before the election the dog days of summer are full of rampant Vice-Presidential speculation within both parties. Millions of words are being written about the rumors and the numerous possibilities. Every day a new name seems to surface on either side...It is really sort of ridiculous considering how little consequence the Vice-President's have played in Presidential elections...

However, regardless of this historical reality Senator McCain has a unique opportunity as the leader of the Republican Party to anoint an heir to the Republican throne. McCain is 72 years old! If he were to win and run a second time he would be 76 by the time the next election comes along -- Considering his age he has to look to the future with his nominee.

Many pundits and analysts have zeroed in on Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota as a safe and "do-no-harm" type of pick. I predict that this will ultimately be Senator McCain's choice, as a safe non-descript and innocuous selection. Pawlenty will enthuse no one, but he will also offend very few. He is the vanilla ice-cream cone selection.

Unfortunately, the pick of Pawlenty disregards the two people who are most deserving of the selection -- Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee. We may have forgotten this year's primary, but it was the spirited campaigns of Romney and Huckabee that allowed McCain to squeak to the nomination in state after state after state. Romney and Huckabee combined dwarfed the votes McCain received in the contested primaries. They both are excellent communicators experienced governors and have passionate supporters and population centers that they would shore up. They proved themselves competent debaters and would be capable of responding to Obama's positions and serving as the attack dog while McCain remains above the fray.

The problem is that they and their most passionate supporters are not fans of each other -- This causes rage in the blogosphere towards both men.

However, should the best choice for all be eliminated just because of the loud rage of the most vocal few?

My proposal is simple. McCain needs to pick one of the two.
If it is Huck, Romney supporters should chill out -- If it is Romney, Huckabee supporters should do the same.

It just seems unreasonable that the two people who are most deserving, most fully-vetted and most prepared to bring with them an organized and enthusiastic base of supporters should be completely ignored.

How about it Romneybots and Hucksters?
Can we forge a truce, waive the white flag and rise above the differences for the good of the nation?

It seems like a common sense approach. I trust McCain's judgment if he picks between the two.

How about it?

George McGovern and the Employee Free Choice Act


The Employee Free Choice Act Violates The Core Principles Of America.

Please take some time to educate yourself regarding this potentially devasting legislation that looms in the horizon with an Obama presidency. This law eliminates the secret ballot during union elections and is a significant step toward the Europeanization/Socialization of our economy and work place.

Occasionally a principled politician will step away from partisan bickering and take a stand against a dangerous piece of legislation. Today, former Democratic Presidential Nominee George McGovern did just that by denouncing this poorly conceived law.


I tip my hat this evening to Senator McGovern and hope that America will take a close look at the devasting potential effects of this legislation.
For further information please see my two previous posts on this urgent topic:

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

McCain The Rock Star



Over the past two weeks McCain and his team have really started to stick a spear in the side of Barack Obama. After Obama's ego-trip around the world failed to even produce a single uptick in the polls McCain has gone on the attack via two very clever internet ads and now a well-timed and very imaginative appearance at the Harley Davidson Rally in Sturgis, South Dakota.

McCain put it best, "As you may know, not long ago, a couple of hundred thousand Berliners made a lot of noise for my opponent. I'll take the roar of 50,000 Harleys any day! (cheers) Any day, my friends!"

Obama is not surviving the long hot-summer where the major candidates are vetted by the American people. McCain is even leading in some polls - despite a tremendous disadvantage in the free media advertising from the main stream media.

Is a blow-out for McCain brewing? Just think if he holds all of W's states from 2004 and picks up Michigan and New Hampshire -- That would give him an electoral win of 307-231 -- I think that exact margin may be around the corner...And if the blue collar democrats of Pennsylvania turn for McCain this thing becomes a laugher. If you are intellectually honest you will have to admit that the likelihood of McCain's wins in Michigan and New Hampshire are much more plausible than similar Obama pickups in Virginia and Ohio.

Obama's path to victory is very murky at this point...

Monday, July 28, 2008

JEB BUSH FOR VICE-PRESIDENT








How would you like to be penalized for the actions of your brother? Let's be honest -- That is exactly what is happening to the former Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush. I have been analyzing McCain's VP options over the last few weeks and have come to the realization that McCain really only has two options -- Jeb Bush or Tim Pawlenty.




Jeb Bush is a pick that would instantly bring tremendous energy and media attention to the McCain campaign. Jeb would electrify the Republican base, send the media into a frenzy, and improve McCain's chances in the electoral college by locking down the south and Florida and instantly bringing the Hispanic vote into play. Jeb is fluent in Spanish and his wife Columba is a native of Mexico. Jeb graduated from UT-Austin with a degree in Latin American studies and built a very successful business career in Banking and Real Estate Development. He is very popular with the Jewish vote as he carried 44% of that vote in Florida during his re-election campaign. He would also be a token to the Republican base and reach economic, social and foreign policy conservatives.



The only reason he is not being considered is because he is the President's brother. But, that really is not a legitimate reason. Jeb is a completely different person and has had a totally different life. This pick is one of the few that could bring energy and excitement to McCain campaign and steal a little of the thunder away from Obama. I wish McCain would prove himself a maverick and select a Vice-President like Jeb Bush who would bring some energy and enthusiasm to the campaign.
Unfortunately, Jeb Bush is not going to happen and McCain will resort to the "vanilla ice-cream cone" pick of Tim Pawlenty. It will be Pawlenty -- It is obvious McCain will pick Pawlenty. It is the safest and blandest pick possible and will fit right in the campaign that McCain is currently running...






OBAMA'S FREE RIDE


Wouldn't this cartoon be awesome if it could be redrawn with PUMA supporters and Conservative Bloggers pushing McCain from behind to victory?! We need to step it up a notch. Obama's media monopoly requires an increase in our efforts. RALLY TO MCCAIN -- PASS THE WORD! If there was ever a time when we need to step out of our comfort zones and vocalize our political feelings -- This is the year. Only a unified front will defeat Obama and the world-wide media onslaught. McCain can not do this alone. Tell your friends -- Email them great posts you find all over the net. Email them clever political cartoons. Donate money to McCain. Constantly remind everyone you meet that Obama's lack of experience, radical internationalist views and potential partnership with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi is a bone chilling combination.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

OBAMA'S MAJOR CREDIBILITY GAP WITH THE SILENT MAJORITY




With all of the hoopla and incessant media pandering to Barack Obama a simple fact remains that is the most powerful force in American politics -- the power of the silent majority. These are the Americans who with little fan fare consistently keep America on the safest and most secure course. Obama's radical internationalist views and plans to massively expand the scope and power of the Federal government are at odds with the patriotic silent majority who day after day go to work and raise their families. They do not respond well to pandering and can see through the cellophane thin resume of the current Democratic presumptive nominee. Obama is a straw-man for the media and the radical left and he will not survive the scrutiny and the wisdom of the American people. Thank you to the silent majority -- we are going to need you more than ever as the media has abandoned all illusions of objectivity and have embraced a candidate who gives them the chance to make the most money by selling snake-oil to the American people. WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS CHARADE SITTING DOWN!


DEFINITION OF THE SILENT MAJORITY

The silent majority is an unspecified large majority of people in a country or group who do not express their opinions publicly. The term was first used by the U.S. President Richard Nixon in a November 3, 1969 speech, where it referred to those Americans who did not join in the large demonstrations against the Vietnam War at the time, who did not engage in riots and attack police officers, who did not join in the counterculture, and who did not enthusiastically participate in public discourse or the media. Nixon along with many others saw this group as being overshadowed by the more vocal minority.


This majority referred mainly to the older generation (those World War II veterans in all parts of the United States) but it also described many young people in the Midwest, West and in the South, many of whom did eventually serve in Vietnam. The Silent Majority was mostly populated with the blue collar people who allegedly didn't have the ability or the time to take an active part in politics other than to vote. They did, in some cases, support the conservative policies of many politicians. Others were not particularly conservative politically, but resented what they saw as disrespect for American institutions.


Since Nixon, many conservatives have pointed to the silent majority as a force still ignored by the media, who, in the eyes of conservatives, focus generally on sensational activities of both parties to boost the media's own viewer ratings.

Friday, July 25, 2008

OBAMA IS A MEGALOMANIAC


a symptom of mental illness marked by delusions of greatness


Megalomania is an unrealistic belief in one's superiority, grandiose abilities, and even omnipotence. It is characterized by a need for total power and control over others, and is marked by a lack of empathy for anything that is perceived as not feeding the self.
Although megalomania is a term often ascribed to anyone who is power-hungry, the clinical definition is that of a mental illness associated with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
Narcissism is most simply defined as self-love. Though it is considered healthy to care about your own well-being and have a healthy self-esteem, when someone loves himself to the exclusion of all else and others become objectified to be used only to serve the self, this is no longer considered healthy or normal.

There are different psychological theories about how and why NPD develops, most of which relate to the integration of different aspects of ego and self as a child, and the nature of the parental roles in that process. Regardless of theory, NPD is characterized by extremely low self-esteem, which is compensated for by delusions of grandeur and megalomania, a narcissistic neuroses. With the propensity to act only on behalf of one's self, the unbridled need to feed one's ego, and the objectification of others to serve the power-hungry needs of megalomania, it is easy to see how this can be a recipe for disaster, especially when wrapped in a charismatic personality.

One of the most well known examples of megalomania in modern history was Adolf Hitler. A street waif, Hitler wasn't content rising through the ranks to become the military leader of Germany. His megalomania drove him to aspire to conquer the entire world. Being born into a "superior race" also wasn't enough for the mentally ill Hitler. Instead, he wanted to wipe out all other races. This need to destroy everything outside of what he perceived as an extension of himself is a classic though horrifically illustrated example of megalomania. Paradoxically, a person who exhibits such tremendous ego and self-confidence in reality has such low self-esteem and such a fragile ego that he cannot abide any expression other than his own, for fear of annihilation of the self. Therefore everything that is not under his control is perceived as a threat.

While genocide is an extreme example, serial killers may also suffer from megalomania. They objectify, then sacrifice their victims to exercise total control with a complete lack of empathy for the suffering of others.

The principles or characteristics of NPD and megalomania can also be expressed in lesser degrees or in a different fashion by those we might consider more mainstream than genocidal maniacs and serial killers. Among dictators, fundamentalists, and politicians we find those who view themselves as morally superior with the willingness to sacrifice, kill, or risk the safety of others considered inferior in order to assert their own agendas. Though there are legitimate circumstances in which leaders must exercise civil or military force, or religious zealots can profess solemn beliefs, the line between religiosity and fanaticism, between duty and megalomania, can be a gray one. This is how the term has become part of our culture's vernacular.

Megalomania is also sometimes associated with bipolar disorder; a depressive illness that is characterized by mood swings from extreme lows to extreme highs. During the latter cycle, people often suffer delusions of grandeur and feelings of infinite capability. They talk about unrealistic plans and goals as if these plans and goals are within their grasp.
Schizophrenia, a mental illness characterized by delusions, hallucinations and extreme paranoia, is also often found alongside megalomania.

NPD, megalomania, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia can all be treated with medications. If you or someone you know is experiencing manic moods, unrealistic delusions or antisocial behavior, professional treatment is necessary. Unlike a virus or cold, these disorders will not improve without treatment.


http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-megalomania.htm

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Blogosphere Chatter Is Negative About Romney

Say what you will about Mitt Romney's chances for VP, but he sure attracts a lot of negativity in the blogosphere. You may think this is unimportant, but in an era when the NY Times is seeing its profits drop by 82% the new media folks in the blogosphere are playing a more and more important role in political dialogue.

Personally, I like Mitt. Regardless of his political missteps over the course of his career, he is undeniably bright, energetic and a proven leader. I like the idea of having someone who is financially liberated helping to lead the country. That leaves him beholden to no one. For some reason Mitt strikes a negative chord with many people. For this reason alone I think he gets passed by. McCain will probably pick Pawlenty -- much less intellectual horsepower for much less negative hype.

Take a read for yourself of the consistent negative messaging against Romney. It is pretty astonishing.


Romney A Mistake For McCain -- Dick Morris

What You Would Get In A Vice-President Romney -- RFFM.ORG

The Case Against Mitt Romney -- BizzyBlog

Why Mitt Romney Generates So Much Heat --Race42008

Totally Selfish Request -No Mitt Romney -- DailyKos

Mitt Romney Continues To Beg Shamelessly For Vice-Presidency -- Wonkette

Lest We Forget - Romney Versus McCain -- Stephen C. Rose

The Barest Whisper Of What Is To Come If Romney Is The VP Pick -- Green Mountain Politics

Mitt Romney Fiscally Conservative??? -- Conservative Oasis

Mitt Romney Will Be McCain's VP -- Say Anything Blog

Mitt Romney #7 On The List Of VP Candidates -- Right Runner

McCain - Just Say No To Mitt Romney -- Conservative Women Speak

Willard We Hardly Knew Ye -- RuralVotes

Will 45 Million Buy Mitt The Vice Presidency -- Blogging For Michigan

Who Let Mitt Out? -- Evening Palaver

Mitt Romney As VP Tanks The Republican Ticket -- I Took The Red Pill Blog

Putting Romney Out To Pasture -- Submitted To A Candid Word

Mitt's In The Tank -- Doubleplusundead

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

If The New Yorker Had Been A Satire Of McCain...


LIGHTEN UP OBAMA -- YOU HAD BETTER THICKEN YOUR SKIN -- THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING -- HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BIGGER WHINER IN THE HISTORY OF POLITICS?

Sunday, July 13, 2008

NEW YORKER COVER -- JULY 21, 2008


"Within every satire there is a hint of truth"

"I DON'T BELIEVE IN GAY ADOPTION" -- JOHN MCCAIN

Thank You Senator John McCain for taking a stand on a key issue. In an lengthy interview in the New York Times McCain unequivocally states his position regarding this topic. McCain does not believe in gay adoption. Frankly, I agree with him 100%.

I still can't believe the pass the Democratic candidates were given during the debates with their response to a question about reading a homosexual storybook to second graders. They all believe that it is 100% okay. Senator Obama even goes on to say that refusing to allow such a book to be read in second grade classrooms (these are 7 and 8 year olds) is equivalent to "fanning flames of division" that are dividing our country.

These responses are out of touch with the mainstream of America.

Read for yourself below:

Excerpts from Democratic Primary Debate, Dartmouth, New Hampshire, 09/26/07

RUSSERT: I'd like to go to Allison King of New England CableNews again for another question.Allison?

KING: Thanks, Tim.The issues surrounding gay rights have been hotly debated here in New England. For example, last year some parents of second-graders inLexington, Massachusetts, were outraged to learn their children'steacher had read a story about same-sex marriage, about a prince whomarries another prince.Same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts but most of youoppose it. Would you be comfortable having this story read to yourchildren as part of their school curriculum? I'm going to start with Senator Edwards.

EDWARDS: Yes, absolutely. What I want is I want my children to understand everything about the difficulties that gay and lesbian couples are faced with everyday, the discrimination that they're faced with every single day of their lives.

EDWARDS: And I suspect my two younger children, Emma Claire,who's 9, and Jack, who's 7, will reach the same conclusion that mydaughter Cate, who's 25, has reached, which is she doesn't understandwhy her dad is not in favor of same-sex marriage. And she says hergeneration will be the generation that brings about the great change in America on that issue.So I don't want to make that decision on behalf of my children.I want my children to be able to make that decision on behalf ofthemselves, and I want them to be exposed to all the information, evenin -- did you say second grade? Second grade might be a little tough,but even in second grade to be exposed to all...

KING: Well, that's the point. It is second grade.

EDWARDS: ... those possibilities, because I don't want to imposemy view. Nobody made me God. I don't get to decide on behalf of myfamily or my children, as my wife Elizabeth has spoken her own mind onthis issue. I don't get to impose on them what it is that I believeis right.

EDWARDS: But what I will do as president of the United States is I will lead an effort to make sure that the same benefits that areavailable to heterosexual couples -- 1,100 roughly benefits in thefederal government -- are available to same-sex couples; that we getrid of DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act; that we get rid of "don'task/don't tell," which is wrong today and was wrong when it wasenacted back in the 1990s.I will be the president that leads a serious effort to deal withthe discrimination that exists today.

KING: Thank you. Senator Obama, you have young children at home. How do you feelabout this?

OBAMA: You know, I feel very similar to John. You know, thefact is my 9-year-old and my 6-year-old I think are already aware thatthere are same-sex couples. My wife and I have talked about it. Oneof the things I want to communicate to my children is not to be afraid of people who are different, because there have been times in our history where I was considered different, or Bill Richardson was considered different.

OBAMA: And one of the things I think the next president has to do is to stop fanning people's fears. If we spend all our time feeding the American people fear and conflict and division, then they become fearful and conflicted and divided. And if we feed them hope and we feed them reason and tolerance,then they will become tolerant and reasonable and hopeful. And that I think is one of the most important things that thenext president can do, is try to bring us together, and stop trying to fan the flames of division that have become so standard in our politics in Washington. That's the kind of experience, by the way,that we need to put an end to.

KING: Quickly, have you sat down with your daughters to talk about same-sex marriage?

OBAMA: My wife has.

KING: She has. OK. I'd like to ask Senator Clinton the same question.

CLINTON: Well, I really respect what both John and Barack said.

CLINTON: I think that we've seen differences used for divisive purposes, for political purposes in the last several elections. And Ithink every one of us on this stage are really personally opposed tothat and we'll do everything we can to prevent it.With respect to your individual children, that is such a mater of parental discretion, I think that obviously it is better to try towork with your children, to help your children understand the many differences that are in the world and to really respect other peopleand the choices that other people make. And that goes far beyond sexual orientation. So I think that this issue of gays and lesbians and their rights will remain an important one in our country. And I hope that --tomorrow we're going to vote on the hate crimes bill, and I'm sure that those of us in the Senate will be there to vote for it.

CLINTON: We haven't been able to get it passed, and it is an important measure to send a message that we stand against hatred anddivisiveness. And I think that, you know, that's what the Democratic Party stands for in contrast, all too often, to the other side.

KING: Thank you, Senator.Tim, back to you.

RUSSERT: Thank you, Allison.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

TWO GREAT OBAMA POLITICAL CARTOONS





Wednesday, July 9, 2008

OBAMA IS NO JFK



Obama's Pipe Dream -- He Thinks He's JFK


The hubris and arrogance of Obama and his team are going to rally the American people behind McCain. Hillary only conceded a month ago and Obama's campaign is in a tailspin.

A Republican Convert to PUMA-ism

I have to admit this is a post I never thought I would write. Sometimes conditions change and thoughts are expressed in a way that changes hearts and minds. On that note I would like to declare that I am a Republican convert to the PUMA movement. (If you need a primer on the hottest movement in the country click on this link.)

When the campaigns started last year I fell into the trap like many Republicans of thinking that we should do everything in our power to stop Hillary. I confess that I was persuaded over the last several years by the conservative talking heads that Hillary would be the worst thing for the country. I am somewhat of a moralist and I never really forgave her husband for his adultery while in office. Not only did he cheat, but he lied about it under oath! I thought it was a disgrace to an office held by greater men and patriots. Unfortunately, I let that incident bleed over into my impressions of of Hillary.

But, then a remarkable thing happened. As I followed the election coverage and actually listened to candidates on both sides, I realized that Hillary Clinton is really an amazing politician -- tough, opinionated, strong and well-versed on policy. She does not capitulate or pander. She has her positions which are well thought out and she articulates them convincingly. She is a great candidate. I may disagree politically, but I have to admit I respect her and admire her for her accomplishments.

I thought McCain v. Clinton would have been a great dialogue and debate for the American people. It would have been a true race with two tested and ready politicians who care deeply about this nation. Unfortunately, a certain segment of the Democratic party led by John Kerry and Howard Dean decided that their ego's and need for power were greater than the needs of our country. These Democrats saw Obama as the perfect puppet from which to pull the strings and to give them power. They propped him up, altered the rules and he won the nomination. When you look back and realize he won almost every caucus, you realize his victory was hollow and not a true representation of the will of the people. On top of that the debacle in Florida and Michigan was an utter shame. As a Republican, I watched that play out and I thought, "They are not really going to ignore two of the most important states in the union." But, Howard Dean and his crew found a way to make a mockery of the whole process and alienate the party members in two states. In Michigan they actually allocated delegates to a candidate who was not on the ballot (OBAMA) and did this allocation based on exit polls!! Regardless of your political party, as an American, this has to get you fired up and passionate about the destruction and manipulation of the system.

On that note over the past several weeks I have taken great interest in the PUMA movement within the Democratic party. I think this movement is vital for our democracy and I am outraged that it is being ignored by the main stream media. Their bias towards Obama is obfuscating the true political story that is in the works. I believe that the PUMA's should go to Denver and make a stand for the real candidate from the Democratic side -- Senator Clinton.

Please, PUMA's keep up the enthusiasm, their are many Republicans out there who are sympathetic to your cause. You may think this is because we want to see infighting within your party, but as for me that is simply not the case. I would rather see Hillary come out of Denver and win in a free and fair election, than have Obama anywhere near the Oval Office.

Keep fighting and please vote for this article on Real Clear Politics if you agree. It is a strong way to start getting the message heard. If we unite and keep fighting the media will have to start addressing the circumstances and then we can rally the masses to the cause!! Keep up the good work.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Pay-off the campaign debt + A prime-time speech at the convention + A biographical tribute video + Appearances by Bill and Chelsea...Is That All?




America is looking forward to some great events in the month of August. Our athletes will try to prove their dominance in the Olympics and we will get to witness the spectacle that will be the Democratic National Convention -- more specifically, the complications the Obama campaign is having with trying to appease the runner-up, Hillary Clinton, without reminding the world how many states she won, and how lop-sided the victories were in many of those places. Just a reminder of all the places that preferred Hillary...The list is full of the most populated and important states in the country including Florida and Ohio which Obama has to at least split to have a shot...

California
New York
Texas
Michigan
Florida
Ohio
Pennsylvania
New Mexico
New Jersey
Massachusets
Oklahoma
Arizona
Tennesee
Arkansas
Rhode Island
Nevada
New Hampshire
South Dakota
Puerto Rico
Kentucky
West Virginia
Indiana

A great analysis of the drama at the Democratic Convention was detailed in today's Wall Street Journal. The article is a must read to understand the quagmire and mess caused by Clinton's massive delegate haul. The main stream press seems to already have forgotten, but the Obama The Great won the nomination by the skin of his teeth! My prediction is that Obama will capitulate on all fronts to save the embarassment of a roll call vote. Obama should realize that the Clinton's will seek their own fortune above all other interests, and should not put it past them to sabotage the convention by making Hillary the issue. They still foresee one more good shot for her in 2012.

Hillary's Hit List...The Seven People She Will Not Forgive

When history looks back on the election of 2008 it will always deserve special attention. With Vice-President Cheney's commitment to not seek the Presidency the 2008 election became a wide-open race within both parties. On the Democratic side, Senator Hillary R. Clinton of New York appeared to have the inside track to the nomination, but she was upended by a quixotic rookie Senator from Illinois. Many causes can be attributed to her loss, but seven magnificent endorsements received by Obama early in the campaign tipped the momentum in his favor and he never looked back.

All of these endorsements were received before March 1, 2008 (this signals that these individuals were not simply opportunists jumping on the Obama bandwagon. Many of them endorsed Obama before the primaries began).


5 North Eastern Senators
Senator John Kerry - Mass., Democratic Presidential nominee 2004
Senator Edward Kennedy - Mass., Chairman Senate Health, Education & Labor Committee Senator Christopher Dodd - Connecticut, Chairman Senate Banking Committee
Senator Patrick Leahy - Vermont, Chairman Senate Judiciary Committee
Senator Jay Rockefeller - West Virginia, Chairman Senate Intelligence Committee

2 Female Governors-

Kathleen Sebelius- Kansas
Christine Gregoire - Washington


Two popular female Governor's wouldn't even endorse her! So much for that glass ceiling!

Combined, these endorsements sent a message to the nation that Hillary was out of favor with key party insiders and obviously did not have their trust or respect. Coupled with the endorsements of two female Governors, these endorsements were vital for Obama. If they had been reversed Hillary would be the nominee.

Sunday, July 6, 2008

The Magnificent Seven Endorsements


When history looks back on the election of 2008 it will always deserve special attention. With Vice-President Cheney's commitment to not seek the Presidency the 2008 election became a wide-open race within both parties. On the Democratic side, Senator Hillary R. Clinton of New York appeared to have the inside track to the nomination, but she was upended by a quixotic rookie Senator from Illinois. Many causes can be attributed to her loss, but seven magnificent endorsements received by Obama early in the campaign tipped the momentum in his favor and he never looked back.

All of these endorsements were received before March 1, 2008 (this signals that these individuals were not simply opportunists jumping on the Obama bandwagon. Many of them endorsed Obama before the primaries began).




5 North Eastern Senators-

Senator John Kerry - Mass., Democratic Presidential nominee 2004
Senator Edward Kennedy - Mass., Chairman Senate Health, Education & Labor Committee
Senator Christopher Dodd - Connecticut, Chairman Senate Banking Committee
Senator Patrick Leahy - Vermont, Chairman Senate Judiciary Committee
Senator Jay Rockefeller - West Virginia, Chairman Senate Intelligence Committee

2 Female Governors-

Kathleen Sebelius - Kansas
Christine Gregoire - Washington

Combined, these endorsements sent a message to the nation that Hillary was out of favor with key party insiders and obviously did not have their trust or respect. Coupled with the endorsements of two female Governors, these endorsements were vital for Obama. If they had been reversed Hillary would be the nominee.

GOP PASSION

Here is someone with the money to fund a rebuttal to what Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee Chairman, said recently that many Republicans have never done an honest day's work in their life. The following full-page ad was placed in the Washington Post by a businessman named George J. Esseff, Sr. He paid $104,655.60 to run the ad and only did it because he is sick and tired of the way that 'the rich' are portrayed by liberals these days. It is a great read...
****

You’re a Republican???

In today’s America, ask a growing number of high school and college students; their teachers and professors; the self-anointed media elite and/or hard working men and women of all ethnicities, the question, “What is a Republican?”, and you’ll be told “… a rich, greedy, egotistical individual, motivated only by money and the desire to accumulate more and more of it, at the expense of the environment … the working poor ….and all whom they exploit…”

I am a Republican … I am none of those things… and I don’t know any Republicans who are.

WHAT I AM … first and foremost, is a loving husband of some 52 plus years, the father of four and an American who’s proud of his country… and his country’s heritage.

WHAT I AM … is the grandson of immigrants who risked everything, including their lives and those of their children, to escape tyranny in search of freedom.

WHAT I AM … is a man who grew up during the Depression and witnessed, first hand, the effects of the Stock Market crash and the soup lines that followed. I watched as both my parents and grand parents, who had very little themselves, share what food they had with a half dozen other families, who had even less.

WHAT I AM … is someone who worked his way through college by holding down three and four jobs at a time and then used that education to build a better life.

WHAT I AM … is a husband who, at age 24, started his own business for the “privilege” of working 60, 70 and 80 hours a week, risking everything I had, including my health, in search of a better life for myself and my loved ones.

WHAT I AM … is a businessman whose blood, sweat and tears…. and plenty of them…, made it possible for me to provide a secure living, not only for my family and myself, but also for literally hundreds of my employees throughout the years. Employees, who in turn, were able to buy their own homes, raise their own families and give back to their communities and their country.

WHAT I AM … is a man who believes in God; a God who has blessed this country… and all for which it stands.

WHAT I AM … is someone who knows, if you doubt miracles exist in today’s world, you need only to look into the face of those who received them … and the eyes of those who give them.

WHAT I AM … is an American who’s proud that his President embraces a belief in God; proud of a President who understands, as “politically incorrect” as it may be, there is evil in this world and for the security and safety of all freedom loving people everywhere, it must be confronted… and it must be defeated.

WHAT I AM … is an American who takes comfort in the knowledge that our President refuses to allow decisions concerning the very safety and security of this nation, to be governed by the political whims of foreign governments.

WHAT I AM … is tired of hearing from leading Democrats who see only negativity in America; racism in her people; class warfare in her society and “political incorrectness” in her character.

WHAT I AM … is a former democrat who now understands that it is the soldier and not the reporter that guarantees us our freedoms of press, speech and dissent.

WHAT I AM … is a man who believes in the sanctity of life. A man who is repulsed by the pandering of the political left for votes, at the expense of the unborn.

WHAT I AM … is a husband and father who believes in the sanctity of marriage and the preservation of the family unit.

WHAT I AM … is a movie go-er who is repulsed by those insecure, socially inept, elementary thinking, ego-inflated “entertainers” who have appointed themselves “experts” in the fields of national security and geo-politics and then use their forum to attack this nation, its leaders and its actions…. much to the delight and encouragement of our enemies.

WHAT I AM … is an American who understands the difference between “censorship” and “choice”. Evidently, these individuals do not, because when these same “celebrities” receive public ridicule for their offensive actions, the first thing they yell is “Censorship!”. What they seem incapable of understanding is… the right of free speech and dissent is shared equally by those offended… as well as those who offend. I support and will continue to support those films and performers whom I choose to … and refuse to support those I don’t. It is my right as an American … a right I will continue to enthusiastically exercise.

WHAT I AM … is a voter, tired of politicians, who, every time their voting records are subjected to public scrutiny, try to divert attention from their political and legislative failures by accusing their opponents of “attack ads” and “negative campaigning”…. and the news media who allow them to get away with it. WHAT I AM … is a Catholic who loves his God and his Faith… and who’s been taught to respect all religions whose teachings are based in love, peace and charity. As such, I am embarrassed and ashamed of those individuals, in both private and public life, whose decisions and actions are devoid of any sense of character or morals; individuals who are only driven by what’s best for them … rather than what’s right … often times at the expense of many …. including our national security.

WHAT I AM … is a realist who understands that the terrorist attack that murdered hundreds of innocent Russian children could have occurred here, in our heartland. That’s why I sincerely believe America needs now, more than ever, a President who sees with a clear and focused vision and who speaks with a voice when heard by both friend and foe alike, is understood, respected and believed.

WHAT I AM … is eternally grateful to Ronald Reagan for having the bravery to speak out against Communism and the courage of his convictions in leading the fight to defeat it; and George W. Bush for the vision, courage, conviction and leadership he has shown in America’s war on terrorism amidst both the constant and vicious, personal and political attacks both he and his family are made to endure.

WHAT I AM … is a human being, full of numerous faults and failures, but a man nonetheless, who, though not always successful, has continually strived to do “what’s right” instead of “what’s easy”. A man who is challenging the religious leaders of all faiths, to not only preach to their congregations the fundamentals of “what’s right” and “what’s wrong”, but to also then hold them accountable for their actions in both the public and private sectors.

WHAT I AM … is disgusted with the Courts who, on one hand, call the murder of a pregnant woman a “double homicide” but then refer to the abortion of her baby as, “pro-choice”.

WHAT I AM … is someone deeply troubled by a political party which embraces a candidate whose primary “leadership” qualities center around his protesting of the Vietnam war and his labeling the honorable men and women who fought in it, (50,000 of whom gave their lives in that action), as rapists, and war criminals. That same political party then stepped forward this year to block the appearance of a true Vietnam war hero, retired Admiral and former United States Senator, Jeremiah Denton, (a man who spent seven years and seven torturous months in a North Vietnam prison), from speaking before an open session of the California legislature as part of that state’s 4th of July celebration. The reason Democrats gave for refusing to allow this American hero to speak before their state legislature was because of the “conservative” nature of his views. As an American, that troubles me deeply ….as well it should you.

WHAT I AM … is a man who feels the need to spend, $104, 655.60,(tax paid) of his own money, to purchase this advertisement, in order to set the story straight. Some may say this money would have been better spent feeding the world’s poor. At the risk of sounding self-serving, as an American and as a Republican, for the last six decades of my life, I have done exactly that… and more. Following the examples of my parents and grand parents, I have used my earnings to feed the poor, shelter the homeless, provide housing for the elderly and medical care for the sick….. and continue to do so… and I’m not alone in that work.

WHAT I AM … is someone who is paying for this announcement, at my sole expense, in hopes of opening the eyes of those led blindly by ill-informed elements of our great nation, who, through either ignorance, or malicious intent, repeatedly attack and belittle those of us who belong to a political party that holds true to the belief, “… the rights of the governed, exceed the power of the government”. For those interested, I am speaking only as a tax-paying individual who is in no way associated with The Republican National Committee, nor with any of its directors, or delegates.

WHAT I AM … is a man who understands, “the American way of life” is a message of self-empowerment for all.

WHAT I AM … is an American who is grateful that our nation gives each of us the opportunity of self-determination and the right to benefit from the fruits of self achievement.

WHAT I AM … is an American who wants to preserve that way of life for all who seek it.

WHAT I AM … is blessed to be an American…. and proud to be Republican.



http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/whatiam.asp

www.whatiam.net

Labor Lover: Obama and the Employee Free Choice Act

One argument circling in the blogosphere is the idea that McCain is not a true conservative. Therefore many conservatives are planning to sit out the election or even to vote for Obama in hopes that he will be so terrible that it will re-ignite conservative passions across the country, and lead to better prospects in 2012 and beyond. This line of thought has many flaws, but most of all it ignores the absolute nightmare of a Barack Obama presidency.

One area where Obama's ideas will radically alter the course of the nation relates to his approach to organized labor. Obama pandered to labor throughout the primaries and the chickens will come home to roost if he is elected.


Some highlights of Obama's plans (from the HR Consultancy Hewitt Associates):


1. Massive expansion of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)


*Federally mandated time-off for elder care


*24 hours of expanded leave for parents to attend children's school activities


*Eliminate the FMLA exemption for companies with 25 employees or less


*1.5 billion in aid to State's to expand government sponsored paid leave programs


*Require employers to offer (7) paid sick days a year



2. OBAMA IS A CO-SPONSOR OF THE EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT!!!


If you think that the election in November doesn't matter, or that you should sit out in protest, maybe you should give some thought to a coming storm known as the Employee Free Choice Act. The EFCA will allow trade and industrial unions to form without an election by employees. The only requirement for the formation of a union would be signed union authorization cards by a majority of the employees.As we have seen in the American auto industry -- especially year with the devastating financial results coming out of Detroit -- unions are a disaster for the economy, as employers are forced through collective bargaining agreements to pay above the market bearing rate, thus failing to remain competitive in a globalized marketplace. The U.S. House has already approved the Employee Free Choice Act and the bill has been stopped in the Senate for now (McCain voted to cloture the bill).
However, the election of Democratic President would assure the passage of this economy killer. A Democratic President would also have the power to appoint partisan interests to the National Labor Relations Board, which would allow for increased anti-management practices to be sanctioned throughout the country. U.S. law has evolved to a point where American workers are sufficiently protected, and increased unionization throughout the country would be a recipe for economic disaster.

As an initial primer check out this summary from the Heritage Foundation. This Act is a coming storm for the American economy and Obama is a leading advocate for the bill:






Thursday, July 3, 2008

Newt's Big Idea -- A Common Sense Solution To The Energy Crisis

http://www.afa.net/newtvideo.html


Please watch this, I don't think anyone has a clearer idea on how to get us out of this energy disaster and the fact that we are forecast to spend $700 Billion on imported oil this year.. According to Fortune, China is building 21 nuclear power plants and India 6 and the rest of the world 9, and the Us none.Over 300 more are in the planning or proposal stage including the US. France gets 78% of its power from Nuclear, Belgium 54%, and Sweden 48%. The US gets 19% of its power from Nuclear and that is after a 30 year hiatus on new plant construction in the US. Think how different things would be if we had been building plants like the others and how much cleaner our environment would be. Why does congress refuse to act?

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

What Lies Beneath? Barack Obama Can't Quit Smoking


Why does a guy who is so intelligent, visionary, inspiring, motivating, articulate, and focused on his family ---- SMOKE?
Something doesn't quiet add up on that one...The man with no record leaves us to guess about who he really is...

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

McCain's Cabinet -- A Marketing Strategy

As the campaign rolls along and the dog days of summer begin, the daily and weekly battle to win the 24 hours news cycle has begun. The candidates and their surrogates are working hard to gain points with the media and the public. Politics are about momentum and a little bit of luck. One thing McCain needs to do is to electrify his party. He can not win without his party and their organization, donations and enthusiasm. Yes, he needs independents, but more than that he needs to rally his party behind him to sweep to victory in November.

One idea that would electrify his party and garner tremendous media exposure would be for McCain to announce his Vice-Presidential nominee and Cabinet to the American public. McCain's ability to convince high-profile Republicans to serve with him would bring tremendous energy and credibility to his campaign.

Imagine if a few days before the Democratic National convention if McCain would call a press conference surrounded at the podium by Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee, Arnold Schwarznegger, Rudy Giuliani, Elizabeth Dole, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Kenneth Blackwell, Norman Schwarzkoph, John Thune, Lisa Murkowski, Louis Freeh, Phil Gramm, Robert Gates, Carly Fiorina and other members of his campaign team and national Republican leaders.

During the press conference McCain could give a rousing speech presenting his Vice-Presidential nominee and his Cabinet to the American people. It would be a historic an electrifying moment that would bring the energy and purpose back to the GOP.

Here is a list of the recommended team...

Vice-President
Mitt Romney

A proven executive and leader in the public and private sector. Fully-vetted and able to deliver Michigan and buttress McCain's support in the west. A tremendous fundraiser and friend to the Republican base. This is going to happen.




Secretary of Health and Human Services
Elizabeth Dole

The former head of the American Red Cross and Senator from North Carolina would be adept at increasing efficiencies in this sprawling bureacracy.

















Secretary of Transportation
Mike Huckabee

Who can forget his enthusiasm for rebuilding highway I-95 during the debates. Great communicator, leader and visionary.
















Secretary of State
Fred Thompson


In a world of turmoil and increasing diplomatic complications a steady hand is needed to assure our interests our protected throughout the world. He would be a great face for America throughout the world. A realist who would not underestimate our potential enemies.

















Secretary of Veteran Affairs
Ret. General Norman Schwarzkoph

General Schwarzkoph is an American hero and a proven leader of our armed forces. Few people could bring as much credibility and trust to this role.
















Department of the Interior
Lisa Murkowski

The Republican Senator from Alaska would be an excellent steward of our land and national parks.














Department of Defense
Robert Gates

He has brought tremendous dignity and administrative competence to the role. He should be retained.













Treasury Secretary
Phil Gramm

A free-market advocate and long-time friend and supporter of McCain would be an excellent choice for the Treasury department.













Secretary of Education

Michael Steele is smart, articulate and is an experienced leader and educator. He would be a perfect fit for the department and could hopefully make some alterations to No Child Left Behind so that some of the teachers, parents and students of America would actually support the bill.



Commerce Secretary
Arnold Schwarznegger

If anyone can bring some new energy and enthusiasm into the Commerce department it is the "Governator". If the Presidential succession line ever reached him he would be passed over, but he would be tremendous on the campaign trial and is the perfect antidote to rock star Barack Obama.




Secretary of Labor
Kay Bailey Hutchison

The Labor department led by Elaine Chao is the only cabinet position that has not turned over during the Bush White House. Hutchison is a competent and well-liked Senator who could quickly pickup where Chao left off.


Energy Secretary
Carly Fiorina

At first glance this one could seem like a stretch, but Fiorina would be a great fit. She is a flashy and dynamic leader and would be able to sweep away the cobwebs from a department and policy that is not serving the interests of the American people. Fiorina will shake it up, and if anyone can lead McCain's nuclear power initiative it would be a marketing genius like Fiorina.




Department of Agriculture
John Thune

Thune is a rising star in the party and this pick would give him much needed national exposure and also place a very talented leader at the head of the Department.


Department of Housing and Urban Development

Kenneth Blackwell

Blackwell has already served in the department during his career and his background and previous experience would make him a good match for the position.

Department of Justice

Louis Freeh
Freeh is a patriot and his background as a U.S. Attorney, Federal Judge and FBI Director would bring much needed credibility and respect to the position.

Department of Homeland Security

Rudy Giuliani

His record and experience speak for themselves. He is the best suited candidate for the position. He is also a Patriot and distinguished public servant.



Monday, June 30, 2008

The Crystal Clear Truth About Drilling In ANWR

GET INFORMED!

CLICK HERE FOR KNOWLEDGE





A clear and concise articulation of the ANWR situation. Satellite Photos included.

Get informed!








Tuesday, June 24, 2008

To Young Republicans Everywhere: A Call To Arms


One of the incessant messages circulated by the media is the idea that all of the young voters of America are passionate supporters of Barack Obama. This is assertion of course is wildly overstated. In fact every time I hear the comment, "that the youth of America are trending to the left in large numbers" it begins to get my blood boiling. I concede that so far in this campaign the energy and enthusiasm for Obama by young voters has been very convincing. Large crowds and thousands of small donations have given Obama great momentum heading into the fall.

However, today is the day that Young Republicans everywhere need to unite and give a boost to Senator McCain. We need to end the apathy and begin a grassroots effort to support our nominee. The stakes have never been higher and the time has come for the future leaders of the GOP to stand together and unite to defeat Senator Obama.

The best message we can send is with our donations to Senator McCain. We may be undergrads, in grad school or early in our careers, but we too can amass thousands of small donations for Senator McCain. Please join the Young GOP Revolution by donating right now!

To show our unity of purpose please type the words "Young GOP" in the referral space.

Let's make this effort viral!

Pass this link to all of your friends and colleagues today!!

Friday, February 22, 2008

Predicting the 2008 Election







As the election picture clears up and Obama and McCain seem likely to face off for the nomination, it is important to look past all of the media hoopla and try to make some sense of what will happen in November. A lot can happen between now and November, but as outlined in a previous post, Obama is facing an uphill battle to win the Electoral College. It will take a dramatic upset for him to defeat McCain.

In addition to the uphill battle in the electoral college, Obama is facing a tough task when it comes to demographics. Take a look at the
exit polling data from the 2004 election in the following spreadsheet.



To analyze the demographic data it is important to pay attention to the second column, which represents the percentage each particular demographic represents of the total electorate. For example 42% of the people who took the exit poll had a college degree. These voters were deadlocked 49% - 49% between Bush and Kerry. This category is a great example where Obama needs to change the margin in order to win in the fall.

Other categories Obama needs to target:

People who made less than $50,000 per year broke 55%-44% to John Kerry. These voters made up 45% of the electorate. Obama has to increase this margin dramatically all over the country. This is the low hanging fruit for Obama.

Voters ages 18-29 broke 54%-45% to Kerry. Although, these voters are a small percentage of the total (17%) this an area Obama needs to exploit and increase the margin.

These are just two areas where Obama will need to be extremely strong. The problem he has is that McCain is likely to retain huge leads in the following demographics.

Gun Owners (41% of voters)
Income over $50,000 (55% of voters)
Caucasians (77% of voters)
Men (46% of voters)
White Women (41% of voters)
Age 60 and above (24% of voters)
Southerners (32% of voters)

McCain will also make a strong run at several toss-up demographics including:

Voters from Western States
Voters from MidWestern States
Independents


As with the previous analysis of the electoral college, it is very unclear where Obama will make the necessary inroads within particular demographic groups in order to win the nomination. Obama has run a tremendous campaign to date, but it will take dramatic changes within the demographic groups to foresee any scenario where he can win in the fall.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

For Kerry It Was Vietnam, For Hillary It Is Experience

One can not easily forget John Kerry's ridiculous acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. Kerry started his speech with the words, "I'm John Kerry, and I'm reporting for duty." Kerry chose to make his service in Vietnam the theme of his Presidential campaign. After being lampooned by the Swift Boaters, Kerry and his Vietnam service were relegated to the back pages of the history books. It was an obnoxious decision to focus on Vietnam and because of this mistake, Kerry never was able to gain traction in the general election, losing by a decisive margin in the popular vote and in the electoral college.

This year in the Democratic primary Hillary Clinton has made the same mistake. Hillary's constant mantra boasting of her 35 years of experience is ludicrous. Whoever gave her that advice should be fired.

Where the hell does she come off claiming superior experience? Here Clinton is in the Jan. 14 Newsweek, comparing herself with Obama:

"I wish it didn't have to be a choice. I think a lot of people who are torn between us feel that way. But it is a contest, and the contrasts have to be drawn and the questions have to be asked because, obviously, I wouldn't be in this race and working as hard as I am unless I thought I am uniquely qualified at this moment in our history to be the president we need starting in 2009 … I think it is informed by my deep experience over the last 35 years, my firsthand knowledge of what goes on inside a White House."

Oh, please. Thirty-five years takes you back to 1973, half of which Hillary spent in law school, for crying out loud. I don't mean to denigrate her professional experience. Clinton worked many years in corporate and public-interest law, performed advocacy work for the Children's Defense Fund and other groups, and was a university lecturer. She also devoted herself to raising a seemingly bright and loving daughter, which is no small feat, particularly given the public spotlight and some conspicuously

But in government, Clinton's chief role over the years has been that of kibitzer. An important kibitzer, to be sure—what spouse isn't?—but not a direct participant. Clinton emphasizes in particular her profound experience in foreign policy. Here she is on Dec. 20:

It is tempting any time things seem quieter for a minute on the international front to think that we don't need a president who's up to speed on foreign affairs and military matters. Well, that's the kind of logic that got us George Bush in the first place. Experience in foreign affairs is critical for ending the war in Iraq, averting war in Iran, negotiating a Middle East peace and dealing with North Korea.

But a Dec. 26 New York Times story revealed that during her husband's two terms in office, Hillary Clinton did not hold a security clearance, did not attend meetings of the National Security Council, and was not given a copy of the president's daily intelligence briefing. During trips to Bosnia and Kosovo, she "acted as a spokeswoman for American interests rather than as a negotiator." On military affairs, most of her experience derives not from her White House years but from serving on the Senate armed services committee. In this capacity, William Kristol notes gleefully in the Jan. 14 New York Times, Clinton told Gen. David Petraeus this past September that his reports of military progress in Iraq—since shown to be undeniable—required "the willing suspension of disbelief." (What Kristol and Clinton both fail to say is that the surge's laudable military success has created a short-term opportunity that the Iraqi government and Bush himself are doing tragically little to seize. For example, a much-touted move by the Iraqi parliament to open government jobs to former members of the Baath party is, according to a Jan. 14 New York Times story, "riddled with loopholes and caveats to the point that some Sunni and Shiite officials say it could actually exclude more former Baathists than it lets back in.")

Of all the things Hillary could tout to defeat Obama, experience was not the winning solution. The people of the country saw right through this and thus her campaign and her lifelong lust for power has been thwarted.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

OBAMA VS. MCCAIN -- LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLE!


Can a 71 year old moderate Republican war hero defeat a 45 year old Democratic upstart with virtually no executive experience or legislative record?

The game is on.

Hillary is out of here. The numbers just don't lie. Due to the proportional nature of the delegates, a comeback by Hillary is virtually impossible. Hooray for America!

Without a doubt the Democrats enthusiasm and voter turnout in the primaries has dwarfed any thing on the Republican side -- but will that translate to an Obama win in the fall?

It will be an uphill battle for Obama -- Can he win Florida? Can he win Ohio? If Obama can't flip either of those states, then his path to victory is very unclear against McCain.

McCain is a fighter, a survivor, a good politician. Lofty rhetoric will not phase him in the least. McCain will draw very clear distinctions on issues. This is something Hillary was unable to do.

Michael Medved states it clearly:

"John McCain needs to learn the lessons of Hillary Clinton’s failed campaign. If he tries to emphasize his obviously superior experience and preparation for the job, he’ll lose in a landslide. Obama can easily characterize him as “yesterday’s man” (as he did in his victory speech on Tuesday night) and emphasize his opponent’s advanced age by “graciously” saluting his “fifty years of service.” He thereby makes the point that he himself isn’t even fifty years old, confirming his vacuous declaration that “we are the change that we’ve been waiting for.”
McCain and the GOP can win the election, but only if they draw crisp, unmistakable distinctions on the issues.

Voters should face big questions: do you think America will be safer if we surrender to terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere? Do you want to pay more in taxes to pay for a bigger government? Do you want to pay for your neighbor’s health insurance, or is the nation stronger when we emphasize individual responsibility? Do we want more freedom and opportunity or do we need more government supervision and regulation?

On these issues, on these crucial choices, Republicans can win. If McCain explains those choices clearly and persuasive (and I believe he will) then his problems with movement conservatives will take care of themselves.

If, on the other hand, he tries to run a campaign based on biography and personality, he’ll meet the same fate as Hillary Clinton. Unless McCain offers bold, positive, conservative vision for the future, and draws clear distinctions on the issues, then even this admirable war hero and maverick Naval aviator is, alas, likely to go down in flames. "

Sunday, February 17, 2008

U.S. TO PROVIDE 1.4 BILLION TO MEXICO TO FIGHT DRUG WAR

In a sign of things to come the United States is preparing 1.4 Billion dollars in aid to support the Mexican government's ongoing battle with the Drug Cartels.

The drug related violence and murders in Mexico are spiraling out of control. Last year over 2500 Mexicans were killed in connection to narcotics trafficking.

Mexico is the new Columbia.

Holes In The Border Fence






"Anyone who has spent any time along the no man's land separating Mexico and the U.S. realizes that the proposition of a sealed border is iffy at best. From Tijuana to Texas, along nearly 2,000 miles of scorching desert, steep canyons, winding rivers, and urban mazes, Federal agents routinely strive for the unattainable—to stop the flow of people so desperate for better lives that they will climb, run, swim, tunnel, bribe, and even hide in car undercarriages to get into the U.S. In the past 15 years the government has erected nearly 300 miles of fencing, including sturdy sheet-metal barriers. The number of Border Patrol agents has almost doubled since 2000, to 14,900, supplemented now by up to 3,000 National Guard troops. Still, migrants continue to cross. And they'll continue to as long as Mexico's per capita income remains one-fifth that of the U.S.—and employers in El Norte welcome them."

The border fence is not going to happen. We have to focus on the problem in this country of employers employing the illegal aliens. Until, that is remedied we are not going to get anywhere. McCain has said very little about his border plan, other than he wants to secure the border first.

What about all of the aliens that are currently here? Are we just going to ignore the obvious problem, and think it is going to go away?

Look at the issue in Texas, alone where an estimated 70 percent of the 26,000 births at Houston and Dallas public hospitals in 2005 were to mothers who are undocumented immigrants.

That trend is only increasing day after day, month after month, year after year...

The solutions are complicated, but the problem is still being ignored...

Saturday, February 16, 2008

The Media Admits McCain Is Unstoppable

In a remarkable sign of self-awareness the liberal media is admitting that John McCain is virtually unstoppable as a candidate.

Michael Kinsley of Time Magazine admits that "John McCain is widely regarded as honest, courageous, likable and intelligent. As a lifelong Democrat...I am surely going to vote against McCain, but it is going to take work, and there will be moments of doubt. This will be no fun. McCain is perceived as authentic, which is a deeper form of honesty than mere truth-telling....Among current or recent figures in American public life, only Colin Powell shares McCain's mystical ability to make liberals believe he secretly agrees with them, no matter what he actually says. And Powell has to work at having it both ways...If the Democrats nominate Hillary, both parties will have chosen candidates who are intensely loathed by more than a few of their own members. But the parallel stops there. McCain is widely admired among Democrats, and many Democratic Hillary haters will be happy to vote for him. By contrast, there is no constituency for Hillary among Republicans who can't stand McCain. Nor, for that matter, will many of them vote for Barack Obama. If it's Hillary, people's growing dislike of Bush, his horrible war, his crumbling economy, his tiresome smirk, will help McCain. Even though McCain is the candidate of the President's party and even though he is the biggest supporter of the Iraq war outside of the Administration, McCain is the one who will seem like a new broom that sweeps clean. Hillary, meanwhile, has been transformed by the Washington press corps in the past few weeks from the first woman with a serious chance of becoming President into a two-headed monster always referred to as "the Clintons."

McCain is a tough candidate to beat in November.

Getting To Know Barack Obama


Can Obama Deliver? - The Economist

It's time to start thinking about what a Barack Obama Presidency would represent.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Reaching The Tipping Point In Iraq -- A Tribute To The Blood, Sweat And Tears Of The United States Military


In a report out of Iraq today Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki proclaimed that Al-Qaeda had been routed in Baghdad thanks to a security plan launched a year ago, and would soon be defeated throughout the country.

With a pause to hold our collective breath, and wish for continued good fortune, it seems like a moment to pay tribute to General David Petraeus and the United States troops in Iraq. After four years of intense fighting and the loss of thousands of US troops, and thousands of Iraqi citizens, it seems we may have reached a tipping point where the country can beat back anarchy and progress towards stabilization.

US and Iraqi officials report that attacks across the country are down 62 percent since June while the number of Iraqis -- civilians and security force members -- killed in January 2008 was 541 against 2,087 in the same month in 2007.

This conflict is not over, but a tribute to the progress and efforts of the troops seems fitting.

Forecasting the Electoral College 2008

When the dust settles on the Republican and Democratic primaries, the bottom-line for the nominees will be the Electoral College. George Bush won in 2004 with 286 electoral college votes to 252 for John Kerry. The only difference from 2000 was that Bush was able to narrowly flip New Mexico and Iowa, while John Kerry won New Hampshire. The deal breaker for Bush was the state of Ohio which he won 50%-48% over Kerry. If Kerry had won Ohio, he would be the President.

As we look forward to November, Obama or Clinton knows that in order to win, they have to hold all of the States Kerry won, and flip a few over to their side. Let's take a look at the possibilities:


The Ohio Strategy

The Democrats need to find 18 electoral votes to get the majority. The best strategy is to hold all of Kerry's states and win Ohio. This would give the Dems the clear victory at 271-267. The problem with the Ohio or bust strategy is that John McCain is going to win New Hampshire. McCain's ability to win New Hampshire trumps the Ohio flip and gives the GOP the win at 270-268. Besides, the New Hampshire factor, Ohio is a very conservative state, and even in 2004 with the turbulence of the Iraq war in the headlines, Kerry still lost by 2%.

The Florida Strategy

Again, this would be a deal breaker. If the Dems hold all of Kerry's states and win Florida, they win 277-261. Again, this seems unlikely. The Democratic party is a mess in Florida as they currently will have no voting delegates at the Democratic convention. That is not a good way to enthuse the Democratic base in the state. Also, McCain will have Jeb Bush, Charlie Crist, and Mel Martinez campaigning for him across the state. GW Bush won the state 52%-47%. It seems unlikely that Obama or Clinton can overcome that deficit. Especially as McCain will be the darling of his fellow senior citizens.

The Iowa, New Mexico +1 Strategy

Al Gore won Iowa and New Mexico in 2000. Bush won by a shoestring in both states. The Dems have to see these states as places for major investment. If Clinton is the nominee she could easily try for Iowa, New Mexico and Arkansas. If she holds Kerry's states and wins these three, she would win 270-268. This scenario only seems likely for Clinton, and once Huckabee falls in line I am sure his campaigning would help deaden any Clinton enthusiasm in Arkansas. Remember Hillary is from Illinois, and she has almost a 10% margin to make up.

The Virginia Strategy

This plan would probably include Jim Webb or Tim Kaine as the Dems running mate. It would be an uphill battle, but a possible one. Along with Virginia they would need one more state like Iowa to secure the win. But even a Virginia plus Iowa strategy is thwarted if McCain wins New Hampshire.

The Youth Strategy

This is the most plausible path for Obama. This strategy is all about voter turnout especially among young voters. This could play a factor in numerous states, especially Colorado where CU-Boulder is one of the most liberal campuses in the country, but even if with huge voter turnout across the country among the youth, McCain will deaden that with strengths among the independent voters.

Note that there are still several very plausable tie scenarios in the above map! - Switch Florida to the Dems and Wisconsin to McCain to get 269-269. - Switch Iowa to the Dems and Minnesota to McCain to get 269-269. - Switch Iowa and Ohio to the Dems and Wisconsin to McCain to get 269-269.- Switch Iowa, New Mexico, and Nevada to the Democrats to get 269-269.

What would happen in a tie in the electoral college? -- The Democrats would win, as they control more state congressional delegations by a small margin.

WHAT IS THE BOTTOM-LINE?

A Democratic win in November would be a dramatic upset! Unless, there is a major foreign crisis, a health emergency by McCain or an unpredicted act of God, the Democrats simply do not have a clear path to victory. Not only would they have to hold every state from last time, which is unlikely (esp. New Hampshire), they would have to couple together several other upsets. The most plausible would be an Iowa, New Mexico and Colorado combination, which Obama seems most likely to put together, especially if he picked Bill Richardson as VP. But, that would take a 4 point swing in Colorado and a hold of New Hampshire. If he loses New Hampshire the vote would be 269-269 and Obama would be President because of the House of Representatives.

In almost every scenario a McCain win in New Hampshire would thwart the Democrats. For that reason alone McCain should pick Romney as his VP. Romney would also buttress Nevada, and the midwest, and even bring Michigan into play.

It's time for the GOP to look at the facts, restore the optimism and race to a victory in November.

God Bless America!

2004 Electoral College Map


2000 Electoral College Map


1996 Electoral College Map


1992 Electoral College Map


1988 Electoral College Map


1984 Electoral College Map


1980 Electoral College Map


Thursday, February 14, 2008

Ronald Reagan Would Back John McCain


Michael Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan, has written an article entitled, "Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain." In the article, posted below, Reagan makes it clear that if John McCain is the GOP Nominee, he will be ready to campaign with him and for him.

In 1976, the Ford versus Reagan campaign for the Republican presidential nomination got so heated it looked as if my father and Jerry Ford would never again talk to one another.
When it was over and Ford had won, what did Ronald Reagan do? He simply went all-out to help Ford win his re-election, as did I and as did my sister Maureen. My dad simply followed his rule of backing the Republican candidate no matter who he was.

Assuming that John McCain will be the Republican nominee, you can bet my father would be itching to get out on the campaign trail working to elect him even if he disagreed with him on a number of issues.

Unlike my father, a lot of conservatives stayed home in 1976, and we got four years of Jimmy Carter, whose main legacy was to drive the Shah of Iran from power and create the Islamic Republic of Iran with a bunch of wild-eyed mullahs running the show. He also gave us 20 percent inflation and long, long lines at the gas pumps. And don't forget 440 days of Americans held hostage by the mullahs.

By staying home those conservatives made possible the future election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

We are still suffering from the legacy of James Earl Carter, thanks to the conservatives who refused to follow Ronald Reagan's example and instead sulked at home while the nation was being handed over to the worst president in American history.

We were still in the middle of the Cold War in those days, and by staying home conservatives risked losing that war by allowing an incompetent leader to become commander in chief.
Four years later Ronald Reagan took over, the hostages were immediately released, and he went on to win the Cold War. Now we have another world-wide war going on with a hidden enemy sworn to kill us all, and the policy of the Democrats running for the presidency is to throw up their hands and withdraw from the battlefield, leaving it to the enemy, and our fate in the hands of Osama bin Laden.

Is that what the let's-stay-home-on-election-day conservatives want? Do they want the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama, as their president? Do they want the pseudo-Marist Barack Obama, who reportedly has a photo of the murderous Castroite thug Che Guevara hanging in his Houston, Texas campaign headquarters, hanging that photo in the Oval Office?

Do they want Hillary Clinton, the duplicitous former first lady, back in the White House enjoying all those furnishings her staff allegedly tried to swipe from the mansion?

Do they want a Democrat spending even more money that the government doesn't have on scores of programs right out of Karl Marx's playbook?

That's exactly what they'll get if they sit out the election and stay home on Election Day. That's called biting off your nose to spite your face. Or even more to the point, political suicide.
Let me say this. There has been plenty of battling in the primaries, and I've been in the middle of the battle, but until now haven't committed myself to any candidate, waiting until we had a nominee.

That's over.

If John McCain is the nominee of the party, this Reagan will happily campaign with him. The alternative is unthinkable to anyone who loves this nation.

MITT ROMNEY TO ENDORSE JOHN MCCAIN


A Postive News Story From Iraq



A Department Of Defense press release dated February 14, 2008 reports that three new police stations opened in Baghdad this week staffed fully by citizens of Iraq. A hopeful sign of continued progress in the country...


"The day Huckabee walks away from this race, is the day the Democrats effectively take office" A Prohetic Assertion/Delusion By A Huckabee Supporter?

Eight Questions For Huckabee Fans:

Can we waive the white flag?
Can we give you an olive branch?
Are you really going to sit out the election?
Where was all the passion for Huckabee before McCain emerged as the nominee?
When are you going to stop the insanity and deal with reality?
Have you formed your own party?
On the day McCain receives the 1191 delegates will you back him?
Honestly, what is so great about Huckabee? Other than being from the south?

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The Inevitable Hillary is a Loser

Nathan Hale

Hillary and Bill are not going back to the White House. Here are 13 reasons why:

1.Hillary has no class. She has been swept away in the last seven primaries and she can not even acknowledge Obama’s sweeping victories. She pretends they did not happen and do not matter.
2.Americans could not come to grips with the idea of Bill Clinton roaming around the White House for years with nothing to do.
3.Her “ready on day one” and “35 years of experience” did not sell.
4.Nobody cares what her mute daughter thinks.
5.Kennedy and Kerry jumped her sinking ship weeks ago.
6.The base knows she voted to go to war in Iraq.
7.She is now loaning her stalled campaign millions.
8.She has now employed the failed Giuliani firewall strategy.
9.The media [the vast left wing conspiracy] has turned on her.
10.Race bating by Bill in South Carolina backfired.
11.Americans wonder if she has a dress.
12.The Clintons lust for personal power is a turn off.
13.Bill is relieved that she is a loser; he is now off the hook.

Roger Clemens' Wife Was Taking HGH?

Roger Clemens' wife was taking HGH?

Is it possible that our Congress actually spent a day on this issue?

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/2008/02/08/2008-02-08_source_brian_mcnamee_testified_roger_cle-2.html


It seems like their should be about a million things more important than this.

The Employee Free Choice Act -- A Coming Storm


The Employee Free Choice Act

If you think that the election in November doesn't matter, or that you should sit out in protest, maybe you should give some thought to a coming storm known as the Employee Free Choice Act. The EFCA will allow trade and industrial unions to form without an election by employees. The only requirement for the formation of a union would be signed union authorization cards by a majority of the employees.

As we have seen in the American auto industry -- especially this week with the devastating financial results announced by General Motors -- unions are a disaster for the economy, as employers are forced through collective bargaining agreements to pay above the market bearing rate.

The U.S. House has already approved the Employee Free Choice Act and the bill has been stopped in the Senate for now. However, the election of Democratic President would assure the passage of this economy killer.

A Democratic President would also have the power to appoint partisan interests to the National Labor Relations Board, which would allow for increased anti-management practices to be sanctioned throughout the country.

U.S. law has evolved to a point where American workers are sufficiently protected, and increased unionization throughout the country would be a recipe for economic disaster.

Should Conservatives Back Mac?

This is an excellent piece by Jonah Goldberg of The National Review. It outlines three major areas where President Bush deserves the blame for violating conservative principles.

1. Bush signed the Campaign Finance Bill
2. Bush endorsed amnesty for illegal aliens
3. Bush signed the prescription drug benefit (which John McCain voted against)

Very much worth the read.

Jonah Goldberg in USA Today

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/02/should-conserva.html

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

The McCain Mutiny


Like the Naval officer in the classic film "The Caine Mutiny", Senator John McCain is facing a vigorous insurrection from within the GOP party. McCain has a lock on the GOP nomination, but continues to be battered by conservatives in the media and in the blogosphere. Can he bring the party together? Will the party faithful stay home in November? Do they really hate the Senior Senator from Arizona?

This is a man who has voted with the Republican party 88.1% of the time during the current congressional session. That percentage ranks him higher than the following Senators:

Bob Corker
Mel Martinez
Larry Craig
Lindsey Graham
Thad Cochran
Lamar Alexander
James Inhofe
Orrin Hatch
John Kyl
Jim Demint
Kit Bond
John Warner
John Sununu
Charles Grassel
Judge Gregg
Tom Coburn
Ted Stevens
Lisa Murkowski
Norm Coleman
Chuck Hagel
Richard Lugar
Norm Coleman
Susan Collins
Olympia Snowe
Gordon Smith
Arlen Specter

Now, it is important to concede that Senator McCain has also missed some votes due to the campaign, however an 88% mark for the last year seems pretty consistent. A lifetime conservative ranking of 82% shows a career of consistent party line votes.

Has he ever wandered? Yes. But, if Governor Huckabee or Governor Romney had that many years in the Senate, what would their voting record have looked like? It is doubtful that either one of them could have been much more consistent.

Nevertheless, the bitterness and vitriol against McCain continues.

The constant carping against the nominee will not help to build the needed enthusiasm to win in November.

Will it ever stop? Or is the party fractured for good?

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/senate/party-voters/

Enforcing Immigration Laws Actually Works

According to an article in the New York Times illegal aliens are fleeing Arizona after a new law went into effect that suspends or revokes the business license of companies who knowingly hire illegals. The article also points to a slowing economy as a contributor to the migration out of the state.

There are a lot of ideas to deal with the issue of illegal aliens. Logistically it would be a nightmare to try and round up and deport all of the illegal aliens. Granting them amnesty would not only reward law breakers but it would also encourage more illegals to come. Building a fence may deter some but anything short of a "Berlin Wall" with armed troops will only partially help.

Arizona may be onto something. By eliminating the ability for the illegals to work they have no incentive to come illegally. We'll have to wait and see how things play out in Ariziona.

Thank You, Barack Obama!

Regardless of your political preference a show of gratitude at this time to Barack Obama seems appropriate.

Consider these typical editorial comments from New York Newspapers from July and October of 2007...

"Barack Obama's entry into the presidential race is working out just fine for Hillary Clinton.Since he unexpectedly stepped forward to run late last year, Illinois' junior senator has helped curtail John Edwards' early momentum, starved the other six Democratic candidates of badly-needed oxygen, and kept Al Gore at bay - each a significant boon to Mrs. Clinton's efforts.At the same time, Mr. Obama himself has proven an underwhelming candidate (except in the fund-raising department), one who has thus far failed to develop and articulate a specific message that might stem the stubborn gap - in national polls and key early states - that separates his second-place candidacy from the front-running former First Lady.Indeed, while the Republican race is unusually unsettled and cluttered at the top, the Democratic nominating contest, six months from the first caucus, has a rather definite shape: Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama seem to be the only two candidates with realistic shots at the nomination, and Mrs. Clinton much more so than Mr. Obama. Hillary now enjoys commanding leads in two of the first four primary and caucus states: Nevada and New Hampshire, where polls consistently show her 15 to 20 points ahead of Mr. Obama, her nearest challenger. Data from South Carolina has not been quite as consistent, but Hillary leads Mr. Obama in most surveys there as well, and she's even supplanted Mr. Edwards, the long-time Iowa front-runner, in several recent polls there.The Democratic nominating contest will play out in two waves early next year: A two-week series of stand-alone contests (Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, in that order), followed by the almost certainly decisive "Tsunami Tuesday" in early February, when about two dozen states will hold primaries and caucuses. (There may end up being a fifth stand-alone contest in Florida, another state where Mrs. Clinton holds a lop-sided polling advantage.)From a practical standpoint, this means that if any candidate is to overtake Hillary, that candidate will need to win at least two of those early contests, three maybe, in order to generate the momentum required to defuse Mrs. Clinton's inevitability in the "Tsunami Tuesday" states."
So Far, Obama Has Been Good For Hillary, New York Observer, July 12, 2007, Josh Benson


"It is inevitable, apparently, that Hillary Clinton will become the Democratic presidential candidate. And it is inevitable, some go on to say, that Mrs. Clinton will therefore become president.It is not just dyed-in the-wool Democrats who say such things. It is President Bush's view, too, that a Clinton candidacy is an inevitability, though party loyalty ensures that he cannot bring himself to say that it is inevitable she will win the White House. He says, as well he might, he thinks the Republican candidate also stands a chance. And it is not just politicians and pundits who say Mrs. Clinton's accession is inevitable. All the polling and other evidence, both national and local, suggests that Mrs. Clinton is a shoo-in..."
The Inevitable?, The New York Sun, October 10, 2007 Wednesday, OPINION; Pg. 8, NICHOLAS WAPSHOTT

Thanks to the incredible campaign of Barack Obama, the air of inevitability has vanished and Senator Clinton is now fighting for her political life. It is a remarkable political story, and one that is very good for America.

The Clinton fatigue across the nation spreads deep into both parties. Even Ted Kennedy, the most liberal and established Senator in the nation has endorsed Obama. That really is remarkable.

Clinton is down, and the momentum is rolling against her, and let's hope it continues.

Thank you Senator Obama for leading the fight. The country can not afford another Clinton presidency.

For Better Or Worse Mike Huckabee Is A Looter

In her fabled classic, "Atlas Shrugged", the late Ayn Rand divides the people of the world into two distinct groups. The first group are the "Producers". These are the people that create, organize, build and lead society. Rand postulates that if the "Producers" went on strike that the world would fall into anarchy.

The second group of people are "Looters". They siphon off of the "Producers" ability and believe that the "Producers" should be forced to share with the masses. The "looters" are not fans of individual achievment, rugged individualism or capitalism.

Obviously, Rand paints the world in simplistic terms, but she forces each reader to decide if they are a producer or a looter.

If you pointed a gun to my head and forced me to make the call regarding Mike Huckabee, I would have to say that he is a looter, and that is why he is unappealing to 70% of the Republican party.


In his own words, "I think we need a President who comes from Main Street not from Wall Street."

Come on Mike, what kind of comment is that? What are you trying to say?

As a capitalist, I am thankful for the guys and gals on Wall Street, and I appreciate their industry, drive, ambiton and competence.

I hope they never go on strike.

Monday, February 11, 2008

Reagan's Liberal Legacy

Adapted from an article By Joshua Green
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0301.green.html

Reagan was one of the most conservative president’s in US History. His record is not as ideologically pure as some remember. Some facts to consider:

Rather than abolish the departments of Energy and Education, as he had promised to do if elected president, Reagan added a new cabinet-level department--one of the largest federal agencies--the Department of Veterans Affairs.

In 1983 Reagan made one of the greatest ideological about-faces in the history of the presidency, agreeing to a $165 billion bailout of Social Security.

One year after his massive across the board tax cut, Reagan agreed to a tax increase to reduce the deficit that restored fully one-third of the previous year's reduction.

Faced with looming deficits, Reagan raised taxes again in 1983 with a gasoline tax and once more in 1984, this time by $50 billion over three years, mainly through closing tax loopholes for business. Despite the fact that such increases were anathema to conservatives--and probably cost Reagan's successor, George H.W. Bush, reelection--Reagan raised taxes a grand total of four times just between 1982-84.

The historic Tax Reform Act of 1986, though it achieved the supply side goal of lowering individual income tax rates, was a startlingly progressive reform. The plan imposed the largest corporate tax increase in history--an act utterly unimaginable for any conservative to support today. Just two years after declaring, "there is no justification" for taxing corporate income, Reagan raised corporate taxes by $120 billion over five years and closed corporate tax loopholes worth about $300 billion over that same period. In addition to broadening the tax base, the plan increased standard deductions and personal exemptions to the point that no family with an income below the poverty line would have to pay federal income tax. Even at the time, conservatives within Reagan's administration were aghast. According to Wall Street Journal reporters Jeffrey Birnbaum and Alan Murray, whose book Showdown at Gucci Gulch chronicles the 1986 measure, "the conservative president's support for an effort once considered the bastion of liberals carried tremendous symbolic significance." When Reagan's conservative acting chief economic adviser, William Niskanen, was apprised of the plan he replied, "Walter Mondale would have been proud."

The fact that Reagan's presidency didn't accomplish anything approaching its seismic promise--the size of government grew, abortion remained legal, and entitlements still abounded--is one that his partisan biographers elide by focusing on what Reagan believed and said rather than on what he actually did.

Jeb Bush Endorses McCain

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush Endorses John McCain For President

ARLINGTON, VA -- U.S. Senator John McCain's presidential campaign today announced that former Florida Governor Jeb Bush has endorsed John McCain for president.

"John McCain is a patriot and devoted conservative leader," said Governor Bush. "Like no other candidate in the field, John McCain has made tremendous sacrifices for this nation. He is beholden to no interest other than that of the public good. He is determined and steadfast in his commitment to reducing the burden of high taxes, restoring the people's trust in their government, and winning the war against radical Islamic extremists. It is with pride that I announce my endorsement of John McCain for president."

John McCain thanked Governor Bush, saying, "I am very proud to have Jeb Bush's support. He has a distinguished record of conservative leadership and I admire his dedicated service to the people of Florida. He makes a great addition to our growing team of Republican leaders."

Jeb Bush was born in Midland, Texas. After earning his bachelor's degree at the University of Texas at Austin, Mr. Bush married Columba Garnica Gallo. Mr. Bush started his career in Florida politics as the Chairman of the Dade County Republican Party. He was later appointed to serve as Florida's Secretary of Commerce. Mr. Bush served as Florida's 43rd governor from 1999-2006 and was the first Republican ever to serve two terms.

McCain's Endorsement Stack A Mile High

Can all of these people be wrong?

http://www.johnmccain.com/supporters/

Another Christian Conservative Endorses McCain

On Monday, Mr. McCain also received the endorsement of Gary L. Bauer, a prominent Christian conservative who was one of the few evangelical leaders to endorse Mr. McCain in his race for president eight years ago.

“John McCain has dedicated his life to defending human rights around the world, including the rights of the unborn,” Mr. Bauer said in a statement released by the McCain campaign. “I admire his consistent 24-year pro-life record and demonstrated commitment to the values that keep our families and communities strong.'’

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/mccain-plays-nice-with-huckabee/

A Fair Response To A Huckabee Fanatic

The following is actual commentary by a Huckabee supporter. My responses are in red:


According to RealClearPolitics McCain has 720 delegates & still needs 471 to win.
That means he has to get 44% of the remaining delegates to secure 1191.

2) So Huckabee needs to win 57% of the remaining delegates to force this to a Brokered Convention.

If your goal is a "brokered convention" then you are out of your mind. A "brokered convention" is equivalent to a fractured party. Why would that be your goal? Why do you assert that this somehow strengthens the party? Do you want to destroy the GOP?

At a brokered convention Huckabee would be humiliated. The Romney wing of the party are not supporters of Huckabee. They would coalesce around McCain.

I can't believe I even have to respond to this as the numbers do not add up for Huck. McCain will receive way more than the required delagates prior to the convention. It is over!

3) On Super Tuesday McCain got 42% of the vote in Blue States and only 26% in Red States. Over 60% of McCain’s delegates have come from Blue States. Do we really want our candidate picked by States that we have very little chance of winning in the Fall?

Yes, McCain's strength in the Blue states increases the likelihood of winning the nomination, which is the goal if you are a member of the GOP.

4) Remaining delegates: Red States = 711 [ 70.5% ], Blue States = 297 [ 29.5% ]

RED States Left:
=============
47 Louisiana
39 Kansas
63 Virginia
140 Texas
88 Ohio
39 Mississippi
69 North Carolina
57 Indiana
33 Nebraska
45 Kentucky
32 Idaho
32 New Mexico
27 South Dakota

5) Every time Republicans have gone to a Brokered Convention we have won!

Abraham Lincoln – 3rd Ballot - Won Presidency
Rutherford Hayes – 7th Ballot - Won Presidency
James Garfield - 36th Ballot - Won Presidency
Warning Harding – 10th Ballot – Won Presidency

6) Conservatives Unite! There is still time! Win the Red States and we go to the convention for a discussion about what it means to be a republican.

The only people uniting around Mike Huckabee are Evangelical Christians. That is his base and only source of support. Conservatives have already united around McCain. Stop the delusions and start helping the Party.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

The Democrats Civil War

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/opinion/10rich.html?em&ex=1202792400&en=8603c6542881bd98&ei=5087%0A

This is a well thought article from Frank Rich. Worth Reading.

Sore Losers – Limbaugh, Evangelicals and the heart and soul of the GOP

The incessant carping by Limbaugh & Co. and the Evangelicals reminds me of the trash talking that is pervasive in the NBA and the NFL. Players will make a big play and seconds later they will be yelling in the face of their competitor, or dancing all over the field or court. It is really childish. I know John Wooden or Vince Lombardi would never have stood for such a thing. It falls outside the bounds of good sportsmanship.

Although, I disdain the practice, I do recall a response to a particular episode of trash talking that I fully supported at the time. NFL player Deion Sanders was on the receiving end of some trash talk during a game when he stopped and pointed at the scoreboard, indicating to his opponent, that no matter how much he screamed and yelled, the score told the whole story.

Deion Sanders’ team was winning, and that was all that mattered.

At this time I think it is important to remind Limbaugh & Co. and the Evangelicals to look at the scoreboard. The game is over. John McCain will be the nominee of the GOP at the party convention in August. No matter how much you want to change the result, the game has come to an end.

The sad thing is that you have no one to blame but yourselves. Limbaugh refused to endorse a candidate until the day before Super Tuesday when the die had already been cast. Dr. James Dobson, the leader of the evangelical movement resisted endorsing Governor Huckabee only until recent days.

If these presumed leaders within the conservative movement cared so much about the end result, why were they so afraid to stick their necks out until the very end?

Now, I am only singling them out as being emblematic of the overall problem. The battle to keep McCain from the nomination was going to take a lot more than simply listing his alleged political sins. The rest of the party (70% of us) was fractured among the remaining candidates.

Our inability to coalesce around another candidate is why John McCain is the nominee.

It is our own fault.

We have to look in the mirror and accept that.

Now, that McCain is the presumptive nominee it is time to step back and consider your level of support for the Republican Party.

Stop being sore losers.

Accept the reality and let’s begin the process to defeat Obama or Clinton in November.

If you are a Republican, a believer in the party of Lincoln, the time has come to unite.

I'm a Republican Because...

I BELIEVE the strength of our nation lies with the individual and that each person’s dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored.

I BELIEVE in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, creed, sex, age or disability.

I BELIEVE free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.

I BELIEVE government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn.

I BELIEVE the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least.

I BELIEVE the most effective, responsible and responsive government is government closest to the people.

I BELIEVE Americans must retain the principles that have made us strong while developing new and innovative ideas to meet the challenges of changing times.

I BELIEVE Americans value and should preserve our national strength and pride while working to extend peace, freedom and human rights throughout the world.

FINALLY, I believe the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles of government.

7 Reasons No Good Liberal Votes for McCain

By Nathan Hale
Senator Mc Cain has an agenda that no good liberal could be proud of. What follows are 7 reasons why liberals will never vote for Senator McCain.

1.The War – McCain has been for the bombing, the buildup, the surge, and for staying 100 years to get it right if need be.
2.Taxes – McCain now fully embraces the Bush tax cuts. He is pushing to make them permanent.
3.Guns – McCain will be the NRA candidate
4.Right to Life – McCain will keep the party solidly pro-life.
5.No Universal Healthcare – McCain wants private reform of healthcare not national mandatory universal coverage
6.Judges – McCain is promising judges like Roberts and Alito
7.Budget Restraint - McCain will veto any bill with earmarks attached

McCain is positioned to offer Americans a conservative choice in November. That choice is one a liberal is going to reject.

Hillary Clinton Campaign Teetering On The Brink

Barack Obama is on a roll. This weekends sweep of the primaries has the Clinton camp sweating bullets. Already cash strapped and out of momentum, Clinton has now dismissed her campaign manager. Can you imagine what the closed doors meetings must be like around the Clinton War Room?

We are witnessing a campaign on the brink of total implosion. I give the Democrats a lot of credit across the country for seeing through the mirage and focusing on a new candidate without all of the baggage.



See the inside scoop linked below:



http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Clinton_campaign_manager_out.html

Huckabee's Charm Is Disappearing






"I know the pundits, and I know what they say: The math doesn't work out," Huckabee said Saturday morning at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington. "Well, I didn't major in math, I majored in miracles. And I still believe in those, too."


This statement epitomizes the world view of Mike Huckabee. Unfortunately, the folksy schtick and hilarious one-liners are getting old. As Huckabee wins a couple of meaningless caucuses, one has to wonder if their has ever been a more shameless, and self-serving candidacy in the history of American politics.


What's the point Mike? Do you think you are going to be the VP or get a nod for a cabinet position? Do you want to serious splinter your party? Do you just love seeing your name in the newspaper and your face on TV? This isn't a game. This is reality. The stakes this fall are high. We have hundreds of thousands of troops depolyed across the globe. Our economy is teetering on the edge of a recession. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are two of the most liberal people on the planet.


Nevertheless you vow to press on. With your efforts to rally the evangelicals and conservative radios efforts to influence the agenda by bashing McCain, the Republican party finds itself in the unusual position of fighting a two-front war againts itself.


How can that be productive?


Mike, I really hope you enjoy and relish your day in the sun. Cut out all the news clippings and record your TV appearance for later. I am glad that you are having such a great time in your quest for a miracle.


Unfortunately, your caprices come at the expense of party strength.


Any candidate who does the cost/benefit analysis in those terms and pledges to be a thorn in the side of the nominee has forever lost my trust or consideration.


Enjoy the game.


Saturday, February 9, 2008

John McCain has a 95% rating from Citizens Against Government Waste







John McCain has a 95% rating from the Citizens Against Government Waste.
He is the top ranked Senator in this regard.
See the data for yourself.
http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/VoteCenter?location=S&page=congScorecard&s_oo=JJSlrOfp0VHvMjO6Qw81Qg..

FLASH: McCain To Meet With Romney













Fox News reports that John McCain is planning a meeting with Mitt Romney, to discuss party unification. McCain knows that Romney received over 4,000,000 votes during the primary races and won the CPAC straw poll for the second year in a row. If they can check their ego's -- one might begin to wonder if they would be the perfect ticket in the Fall?




The Right Is Wrong About McCain





Supreme Court Justices and the War on Terror.

Conservatives need to cease the games and Rally to McCain. This is a good article from President Reagan's National Security Adviser.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120251661161755395.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

Political Leanings

A lot has been made of the relative conservativeness of Republican Nominee John McCain. Some pundits have even stated that if John McCain wins the Presidency that it would be the same as if Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama were elected.



This assertion is ludicrous.

Senator McCain certainly has a proven history of being on the right side of almost every issue.



Before you start believing everything you hear, take a look at his record as outlined in the following links.

http://www.conservative.org/archive2/other.asp

When compared to Obama and Clinton the contrast is remarkable.



(I apologize if I have offended Huckabee supporters, by ignoring the fact that he is still in the race. Due to the proportional provision of delegates during the final primaries, he simply has no conceivable way of winning. The numbers don't lie. Get over it.)

The American Conservative Union Scorecard

Senator Name

2006

2005

Lifetime Rating

Years of Service

DeMINT

100

96

98.0

8

COBURN

100

100

97.8

8

INHOFE

100

100

97.5

20

SESSIONS

92

100

97.3

10

KYL

92

100

96.9

20

ALLARD

88

96

95.1

16

BUNNING

96

92

94.9

20

ENSIGN

100

100

94.4

12

CHAMBLISS

96

96

94.4

12

CORNYN

96

96

94.3

4

BROWNBACK

87

100

94.0

12

VITTER

92

96

94.0

8

CRAIG

88

96

93.4

26

SUNUNU

88

83

93.2

10

CRAPO

88

100

92.9

14

TALENT

92

84

92.8

12

ALLEN

96

100

92.6

8

LOTT

88

91

92.4

34

ENZI

96

96

91.5

10

BURR

92

92

91.2

12

DOLE

96

96

91.0

4

BURNS

92

100

90.6

18

GRAHAM

83

96

90.6

12

HUTCHISON

84

92

90.4

14

MARTINEZ

84

100

90.0

2

HATCH

84

92

89.9

30

McCONNELL

84

100

89.7

22

ISAKSON

96

100

89.0

8

THOMAS

96

92

88.9

18

SANTORUM

96

92

88.1

16

FRIST

76

92

87.8

12

THUNE

100

92

87.0

8

ROBERTS

84

88

86.9

26

BENNETT

72

92

85.6

14

HAGEL

75

96

85.2

10

ALEXANDER

72

88

84.3

4

GRASSLEY

88

96

83.3

32

BOND

80

88

82.5

20

McCAIN

65

80

82.3

24

WARNER

64

88

80.8

28

COCHRAN

67

88

80.3

34

DeWINE

72

56

79.8

20

GREGG

72

72

78.7

22

LUGAR

64

88

78.6

30

COLEMAN

68

64

75.3

4

VOINOVICH

56

68

74.6

8

MURKOWSKI

71

83

74.6

4

SMITH

72

58

74.5

10

DOMENICI

75

91

74.3

34

SHELBY

74

88

74.2

28

STEVENS

64

80

64.5

36

Nelson Ben

64

60

55.0

6

COLLINS

48

32

53.9

10

SNOWE

36

32

49.9

28

SPECTER

43

63

44.7

26

Nelson Bill

40

20

41.2

16

CHAFEE

24

12

34.7

7

Byrd

21

20

29.6

36

Pryor

20

24

23.5

4

Jeffords

4

8

23.4

22

Salazar

17

32

22.5

2

Conrad

33

21

20.9

20

Bayh

16

20

20.8

8

Landrieu

24

44

20.6

10

Lincoln

8

16

20.1

14

Reid

12

4

19.9

24

Johnson, Tim

12

13

19.6

20

Dorgan

12

17

17.2

20

Lieberman

17

8

16.8

18

Carper

20

8

16.3

6

Kohl

16

13

14.9

18

Baucus

8

24

14.0

32

Biden

4

8

13.4

34

Bingaman

8

13

12.5

24

Stabenow

16

12

12.0

6

Feingold

8

13

11.8

14

Cantwell

12

8

11.2

6

Dayton

8

16

10.7

6

Feinstein

0

12

10.1

14

Rockefeller

10

4

9.6

22

Wyden

8

4

9.6

26

Menendez

4

0

9.6

14

Clinton

8

12

9.0

6

Harkin

8

4

8.6

32

Dodd

8

8

8.3

32

Obama

8

8

8.0

2

Akaka

0

8

7.4

30

Inouye

8

5

7.2

36

Reed

4

0

7.2

16

Levin

8

17

7.1

28

Durbin

4

0

6.7

24

Mikulski

0

5

6.3

30

Schumer

4

8

6.2

26

Leahy

0

0

6.1

32

Kerry

12

8

5.6

22

Lautenberg

0

0

5.2

22

Sarbanes

0

0

4.8

36

Murray

4

0

3.3

14

Boxer

8

12

3.0

24

Kennedy

0

0

2.5

36


Huckabee's Best One-Liners






On the environment...

"It’s the old Boy Scout rule of the campsite; you leave the campsite in better shape than you found it."

On the Iranian threat...

"The reason that we're so afraid of Iran is because they've got enough oil money to build a reactor. Do you think they could build a reactor if all they had to sell was rugs? I don't think so. So because of our deopendence upon their oid and the saudi's oil we find ourselves once again scared to death of what they can do with the money that guess where they got it... from us."

On Endorsements...

"Yeah. I mean, ask most Americans who’d they rather have: Chuck Norris and his fists or Pat Robertson? I’ll take Chuck."

"Let's be clear: None of these guys made me. This great nation made me. So vote for me. God bless America and forget these three idiots." --on the dispute between Conan O'Brien, Stephen Colbert, and Jon Stewart over who made Mike Huckabee

"When we were in college we used to take a popcorn popper -- because that was the only thing they would let us have in the dorms -- and fry squirrels in the popcorn popper." (Watch video clip)

"I'm from Hope, Arkansas, you may have heard of it. All I'm asking is, give us one more chance."

"I'm pretty sure there will be duck-hunting in heaven and I can't wait!" --speaking to an NRA group

"We've had a Congress that's spent money like John Edwards at a beauty shop."

"Jesus was too smart to ever run for public office...that's what Jesus would do." --after being asked if Jesus would have supported the death penalty

"Whether we need to send somebody to Mars, I don't know. But I'll tell you what, if we do, I've got a few suggestions, and maybe Hillary could be on the first rocket."

"Which one?" --to Mitt Romney, after the former Massachusetts governor told him not to try and characterize his position on Iraq

"And the ultimate thing is, I may not be the expert that some people are on foreign policy, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night."

"I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution. But I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God. And thats what we need to do is amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than trying to change God’s standards so it lines up with some contemporary view of how we treat each other and how we treat the family."

"The point I'm trying to make is that, on the campaign trail, nobody's going to be able, if they've been campaigning as hard as we have been, to keep up with every single thing, from what happened to Britney last night to who won 'Dancing with the Stars.'" --explaining why he was unfamiliar with the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran's nuclear capability

"We ought to declare that we will be free of energy consumption in this country within a decade."

"If anybody wants to believe they're the descendants of a primate, they'e welcome to do it." --answering a question about evolution

"If a person dresses provocatively, they're calling attention -- maybe not the most desirable kind -- to private parts of their body." --after being asked whether he's against miniskirts

On Mitt Romney...

"How many people reach poltical puberty at age 60?"

More huckabee quote at:
http://thinkexist.com/quotes/mike_huckabee/